Lekki shooting: You lack jurisdiction to summon us – CNN tells Panel

0
370

Cable News Network, Inc.(CNN) and its team of reporters have objected to the summons to appear before the Lagos Judicial Panel of Inquiry and Restitution of Victims of SARS Related Abuses.

The Panel had on Saturday, 12 December, 2020 summoned CNN to appear before it to give evidence on their reportage of the EndSARS Lekki shooting.

But, upon service of the summons on CNN’s Lawyers, Messrs. Olumide Babalola LP, the international news outfit instructed their lawyers to file an objection on the ground that the Panel lacks jurisdiction to summon them since they are not in Nigeria.

The objection dated 4th December 2020 but filed on December 9, 2020 at the Tribunal on behalf of CNN, Olumide Babalola submitted that: “The Objectors herewith place it on record that, they were not at all material times and still not at the time of filing this objection, within the geographical territory of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. They do not have any physical or business presence in Nigeria and by extension, they are outside the territorial jurisdiction of this honourable Tribunal.

The Objectors respectfully observed that, the Summons to Witness dated 28 November, 2020 was issued pursuant to the Tribunal’s powers donated by section 5(c) of Tribunals Of Inquiry Law Of Lagos State, Cap. T6 and for the avoidance of doubt, it provides that: Subject to the provisions of this Law, a Tribunal shall have the following powers –

“To summon any person in Nigeria to attend any meeting of the Tribunal to give evidence or produce any document or other thing in his possession, subject to all just exceptions. Summonses issued under this paragraph may be in Form A in the schedule to this Law and shall be served by the Police or by such person as the Tribunal may direct. (Emphasis ours)

CNN submit that, “since the Objectors are not “persons in Nigeria” as envisaged by the provision of section 5(c), then this honourable Tribunal is, with respect, bereft of territorial jurisdiction to compel their attendance to give evidence before it. We rely on the decision in Joshua Dariye v  Federal Republic of Nigeria (2015) LPELR-24398(SC), where the Supreme Court of Nigeria held that:  “Territorial jurisdiction implies a geographical area within which the authority of the Court may be exercised and outside which the Court has no power to act. Jurisdiction, territorial or otherwise, is statutory and is conferred on the Court by the law creating.” Territorial jurisdiction may mean jurisdiction that a Court may exercise over persons residing or carrying on business within a defined area, or in respect of a contract where its terms bring it within the area”.

“Criminal jurisdiction is basically territorial. Thus, jurisdiction in criminal matters in Nigeria is principally and mainly territorial”.

“The law is also settled that a Court’s jurisdiction is prescribed, embedded or engraved in the statute which creates it. It is usually circumscribed and not open ended and at large. Ordinarily, and without express provisions of the creating statute, a Court’s jurisdiction should not be extended beyond its territorial limit. What is more, jurisdiction is not subject to emotion, sentiment, whims and caprices of anyone. It is firmly rooted and must be in accordance and consonance with laid down provisions in the creating statute.”

When the Panel sat on Saturday, December 12, 2020, they invited CNN’s lawyer into the Private Hearing Room where he reiterated his objection and the Panel informed him that they would record the objection in their final report, hence CNN was excused from further proceedings or appearing before the Panel.

Sign up for our daily newsletter

Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox every day. Stay informed with the Orijo Reporter's leading coverage of Nigerian and world news.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here